Author Archives: Stephane Daury

Unknown's avatar

About Stephane Daury

Enjoyer of life; software developer. See https://stephdau.me and https://tekartist.org

First Facebook worm[-ish behaviour]?

Posted on by
Reply

A friend of mine supposedly sent me a Facebook-based invite for an FB app called Advanced Wall. It came as a notification in FB and prompted me to retrieve a message from my contact by adding the app to my profile.

‘k, I bite, since I’m in Facebook-API-craze mode for work and fun anyway and get the following, as allegedly written by my friend:

Check this out!

It’s an Advanced Wall!

You can change colors, sizes, fonts, add smilies, pictures, videos and a lot more…

:)

Odd.. Especially from the supposed author…

First, I was just curious to know if they are using tinyMCE for the advanced editor, like WordPress and co. Evidently, I dig a bit deeper, and fire up Firebug, which as a complete aside is the most amazing piece of software. I use it everyday, and am still baffled by how efficient and powerful it all is.

So, the Javascript doesn’t look familiar and the editor’s iframe goes to http://ai.idlestudios.com/write.php, a domain which strangely enough doesn’t respond under http://www.idlestudios.com/ or http://idlestudios.com/, and just redirects http://ai.idlestudios.com/ to the app’s description inside FB (as of 2007-07-22, ~1 AM).

Odder…

Head off the the terminal: whois idlestudios.com tells me the domain is registered to a more than likely fine fellow from the Russian Federation, which in and of itself doesn’t really imply anything.

But that’s when I start noticing the ads in multiple locations around the Advanced Wall’s WYSIWYG editor. Text ads, subtly placed in the telling Facebook colour scheme. Blockbuster, icon sets, the usual.

So on to my friend’s profile I go, and what do you know? What do I see on his wall, with no other message than:

Check this out!

It’s an Advanced Wall!

You can change colors, sizes, fonts, add smilies, pictures, videos and a lot more…

:)

Really? And it’s coming from someone else in my contact’s own friend list…

Next: Facebook » Profile » Applications » Edit » Remove

:)

This all said, I haven’t gotten a reply from my friend yet on if he actually sent the invite in the first place (it’s late, and the invite was sent at 11:59pm), so maybe I’m just seeing things and outta get to bed. I’ll post an update here when I know more. Call me traumatized by another friend’s experience. ;P See update below.

Personally, I’m not sure I’m willing to go for this one anyway. Best case scenario, it’s gonna be MySpace all over again…

And if by any chance you receive an invite for Advanced Wall from me, you’ll at least know how it did not get there: Not-by-my-click.

Update (20:45): Well, it seems that my friend is as surprised as I was. Although he did see an option to invite his friends, he is fairly sure he canceled. Yet, the app seems to have propagated itself to his contact list. He also had the same reaction as I with the dubious first message template, and brought to light an error message he received from the app stating “there are still glitches we’re working on with the facebook team“. So worm[-ish]? Questionable interaction design? Buggy app? Plain old bad taste? I’m not a security expert by any stretch, so I’ll hold off on the labeling, but as a software developer, I say: none for me, thanks.

We Should Not Bite the Hand that Diggs

Posted on by
Reply

I’ve been noticing that Digg has been getting a substantial amount of cr*p about things they’ve done on and with the site recently. Nothing new or exceptional, as every popular Web outfit gets the community treatment once in a while, but now that the dust settled a bit, I just wanted to express the following thoughts.

I had the pleasure to meet with some of the Digg crew in San Francisco last month, coincidentally hours before they released their new commenting system. What I saw was a group of people who, on top of being passionate about their respective vocations, actually believe in the product they bring us. This is a relatively rare and precious thing, and I think that as a community, we should nurture it as much as we can.

I’m definitely not saying we should just fall into blind fanboy-ism and idolize their every actions, but I do think that there’s a [not so] fine line between constructive criticism, which is usually welcomed by any self-respecting professional, and plain old bashing, which can be the most depressing aspect of public releases. And it’s not like they’re not listening (1, 2).

Yes, I do think that a balance between surprise releases and usability testing could gain to be developed. And yes, I do understand that sudden changes to something you enjoy can be offsetting for users. But I also know that they’re cultivating a tight-group/almost-family-like atmosphere amongst their ranks, and that the last thing I want is for the people behind the code to be nudged anywhere close to just being yet another bunch of salary makers, in yet another faceless corporation.

So I say, keep on guys, and thanks for your efforts. I’ll happily keep on digging and watching the site evolve.

And no, I’m not going to submit my own post to Digg. ;)

A Swarm of Angels: Remixing Cinema

Posted on by
Reply

I found out about this open source movie project last winter, and am happy to see that they are so far reaching their set targets.

A groundbreaking project to create a £1 million film and give it away to over 1 million people using the Internet and a global community of members.

  • P2P-friendly: free to download and share
  • No DRM: watch on anything
  • Creative-Commons licensed: remixable

A fantastic initiative, in my humble opinion.

See also: Elephants Dream, by the Orange Open Movie Project.

Mooooooo

Posted on by
2

I just have to let it all out: I love mootools!

I’m not going to get in a pi**ing match with prototype, jquery, dojo and company, since they’re all truly neat little bundles of joy, but as a write-all-javascript-from-scratch kinda guy, I wasn’t inclined on having to rely on such involved libraries in the past. Especially when coupling them with huge server-side code base that I must keep in mind might actually outlive me. Call it an ever-lasting “vendor” lock-in allergy.

Choosing the best contender to be included in the McGill web platform among the countless available options in the compact JS framework sphere was one of the most difficult tech decisions I’ve had to make in years. But so far, I sure am glad we opted for mootools. Bonus: I didn’t even have to force it on anyone either, and adoption by different levels of developer has proven smoother than in tests involving other potential choices.

Great docs, tight syntax, (close to) worry free platform compatibility and a lively dev community are all among the many benefits we are so far enjoying.

But beware! I’d advise anyone going the framework way to:

  • Do a lot of research before committing to anything, to really gauge what is best for you and your team(s).
  • Not be afraid to write a slew of tests to be implemented in the selected top choices to right away define what has more potential in your very context.
  • And most importantly, not get too comfortable and devolve into a one-lib-only coder.

On this, I’m going back to milking it for all its worth.